Categories
reviews

The Books I Read in 2021

Every year, I participate in the Goodreads Challenge, where you challenge yourself to read a certain number of books for the year and then track your progress.

This year I set a goal of 35 books. I read or listened to 58.

I usually go through the books one-by-one, but I don’t want to write, and you don’t want to read, an annotated list of 58 books, so this year, I’m going to select my favorites from various categories, then post the whole list.

Favorite Fiction

51342031 SY475

The Ministry for the Future, by Kim Stanley Robinson

Like many dutiful readers of speculative fiction, I’ve read my share of “cli-fi” (i.e., fiction that focuses on climate change). Still, Kim Stanley Robinson’s The Ministry for the Future outshines all the others. 

Several of my friends have read this one, and not all of them were as impressed as I was, but I enjoyed the relationships between the characters, the terrible vision of what’s to come, and the possibilities Robinson comes up with as to how any changes at all will be made to our societies.

If you’re living in the 21st Century, The Ministry for the Future is a must-read.

Favorite Nonfiction

Book Cover

The Dawn of Everything: A New History of Humanity, by David Graeber and David Wengrow

Written by an anthropologist and an archaeologist, The Dawn of Everything re-examines our understanding of humanity’s earliest years in light of the latest discoveries in anthropology and archaeology.

But more than an update on the scientific literature, the book restates the question of our origins. With examples throughout the world, they demonstrate that “There is no ‘original’ form of human society…[and that] as far back as we can trace such things, human beings were self-consciously experimenting with different social possibilities.”

Throughout the book, the authors reveal historical examples of various social structures. They use their findings to build new theories of domination and freedom, exploring how the growth of one led to the protection or expansion of the other, a sociological dance that is still ongoing today.

“What if the sort of people we like to imagine as simple and innocent are free of rulers, government, bureaucracies, ruling classes the like, not because they are lacking in imagination, but because they’re actually more imaginative than we are?”

The importance of this book is not just historical; it shows that, from the very beginning, humans have experimented with their social and political structures and that most changes in those structures were self-conscious. Our world has not always been this way, and this way is not an inevitable conclusion to history. We can, and we have always had, the freedom to change.

Not-so-Quick Note: Graeber and Wengrow put forth two major theories in this book. The first defines the primary forms of freedom.

In the United States, freedom is an empty word used primarily by people on the right to rationalize selfish acts. But Graeber and Wengrow argue freedom boils down to three things:

  • The freedom to abandon one’s community, knowing one will be welcomed in faraway lands
  • The freedom to shift back and forth between social structures, depending on the time of year
  • The freedom to disobey authorities without consequence

For example, most indigenous Americans belonged to a clan whose organization went above and beyond their nation, tribe, kin, or even language. Members of the Bear clan, for example, were welcomed into the homes of other members anywhere on the continent, regardless of language or nation. “This made it a relatively simple matter for anyone disenchanted with their immediate biological kin to travel very long distances and still find a welcome.”

Next, many cultures practiced different social relationships depending on the season. Indigenous Americans on the Great Plains, for example, “created structures of coercive authority that lasted throughout the entire season of hunting and the rituals that followed, dissolving when they dispersed into smaller groups.”

Finally, many “chiefs” we read about in history only held power in their immediate vicinity. If you didn’t want to follow the orders of the chief, you just had to move down the road a few miles, where a chief and henchman couldn’t see you. 

In addition, to reduce the arbitrary violence of a sovereign, most societies “would try to surround the godlike personages of [their] rulers with an endless maze of ritual restrictions, so elaborate that the rulers ended up, effectively, imprisoned in their palaces.”

The second major theory the book makes defines the primary principles of social power:

  • Control of violence (e.g., the state’s monopoly on the use of force)
  • Control of information (e.g., religious and civil bureaucracies)
  • Individual charisma (e.g., “I’m special and deserve to be treated differently”)

Graeber and Wengrow invite us to think of “the secret agent” as the mythic symbol here: “James Bond, with his license to kill, combines charisma, secrecy, and the power to use unaccountable violence, underpinned by a great bureaucratic machine.”

Exploring history using these notions of freedom and social domination helps us understand “where we got stuck,” and invites us to imagine what a different world has actually looked like.

Everyone should read this book.

Favorite Graphic Novel

52079617Paying the Land, by Joe Sacco

This is a nonfiction piece about the history of the Dene people in Canada. It covers a broad scope of history, but primarily focuses on the 20th century, when the Dene way of life in the Northwest territories came into conflict with the extraction of oil, gas, and diamonds. 

It tells the horrid tales of “the residential schools,” whose mass graves of dead children drew the world’s attention earlier in 2021. But it goes beyond that, exploring the rise of drug use and alcoholism among the Dene due to generational trauma and Western imperialist efforts to eradicate an entire culture. 

Sacco’s work in this book is incredible. It’s a piece of in-depth journalism that puts you in the heart of the region while empathizing with the myriad individuals Sacco interviewed and researched for the book.

An absolute must-read.

Favorite Story Collection

40600870 SY475

A People’s Future of the United States, edited by Victor LaValle and John Joseph Adams

Each story in this collection imagines a different future for the United States. Its stories include: 

  • A bookstore that skirts the border between America and California.
  • A country where it is illegal to be non-binary, trans, or gay, to speak a language other than English, to not post to social media, or, really, to be anything other than “fine.”
  • A country where “the strongest military in the world turned on their own people.”
  • A country where librarians are the protectors of magic.
  • An entry in a history textbook about the transition from our current political and social reality and into what comes next.
  • A country where violent homophobia has become the norm (in this country, “Albany had had eighteen homophobic hate killings in the previous calendar year. Better than Buffalo, but then again, Buffalo had a 57 percent unemployment rate”), where the government filters art (the story takes place on the night Prince’s songs are added to the filter), and where “the best we could hope for was to keep our head down and find escape wherever we could.”
  • A country where a plague caused by the Doomsday Virus has taken hold.
  • A country where an unnamed but obvious President Trump is faced with an inter-dimensional time traveler caused by the success of the “MAGA Bomb,” a device which “erased a person’s racial development, resetting their genetic lineage back to their original code, called genetic cleansing.”
  • A country where Americans don’t vote with their hearts or their heads, but their fangs.
  • A country where “the full power of…bioengineering [was] not simply set loose on the world but left in the hands of…maniacal power-hoarding fiends, for them to weaponize and deploy at their will.”

And that’s only the first half or so of the stories in this collection. There’s such an embarrassment of riches in this book that I ended up using it to guide much of my reading for the rest of the year, checking out authors I first discovered here.

Favorite Book Series

Trilogy Cover

The Centennial Cycle, by Malka Older

I discovered Malka Older in The People’s Future of the United States. Dr. Older has a bachelor’s degree in literature from Harvard and  a master’s degree in international relations and economics from the School of Advanced International Studies. Her doctoral work focused on the multi-level governance and disaster responses. Professionally, she works for the School for the Future of Innovation in Society at Arizona State University and was the Head of Office in Darfur. She’s worked in humanitarian aid in Darfur, Sri Lanka, Uganda, Indonesia, Japan, and Mali.

All of which is to say that Dr. Older knows what she’s talking about, and in this near-future trilogy, she puts it all to work. 

In her near-future, most nation-states dissolved and the world is made up of polities of 100,000 people — a centenal. Each centenal votes democratically for a particular party to lead it. Some parties are global, with designs to capture a majority of the world’s centenals and thus open themselves to more power, while others are hyper-local with no intentions of expansion.

Further, a highly regulated version of the Internet aims to be the sole provider of facts and information about the world. It might seem big brother-ish,  but it’s more like one solution to the current pandemic of misinformation. You can think of it as a mix of Augmented Reality, Wikipedia, Snopes, Yelp, and the United Nations.

Each book in the cycle furthers the timeline and the narrative while also exploring the stratification, self-interests, and outliers of Dr. Older’s society.

The result is a cohesive setting and a plot with local and global stakes acted on by interesting characters from diverse backgrounds and with various perspectives and desires. The best kind of page-turner.

The Complete List in the Order I Read Them

(I’ve bolded the books I highly recommend)

  1. Family Tree: Volume 1, by Jeff Lemire and Phil Hester
  2. The Hidden Girl & Other Stories, by Ken Liu
  3. A People’s Future of the United States, edited by Victor LaValle and John Joseph Adams
  4. Ken State: Four Dead in Ohio, by Derf Backderf
  5. My Friend Dahmer, by Derk Backderf
  6. American War, by Omar El Akkad
  7. G.I. Joe: Hearts & Minds, by Max Brooks
  8. Code 7: Cracking the Code for an Epic Life, by Brian R. Johnson
  9. Robopocalypse, by Daniel H. Wilson
  10. Devolution: A Firsthand Account of the Rainier Sasquatch Massacre, by Max Brooks
  11. Blackfish City, by Sam J. Miller
  12. She Persisted: Harriet Tubman, by Andrea Davis Pinkney
  13. Liquid Reign, by Tim Reutemann
  14. Solutions & Other Problems, by Allie Brosh
  15. Kill Switch: The Rise of the Modern Senate, by Adam Jentleson
  16. The Mere Wife, by Maria Dahvana Headley
  17. The Adoption, by Zidrou
  18. The Sacrifice of Darkness, by Roxane Gay and Tracy Lynne Oliver
  19. The Ministry for the Future, by Kim Stanley Robinson
  20. The Times I Knew I Was Gay, by Eleanor Crewes
  21. Paying the Land, by Joe Sacco
  22. The Damascus Road, by Jay Parini
  23. Piranesi, by Susanna Clark
  24. To A God Unknown, by John Steinbeck
  25. The Silence, by Dom Delillo
  26. Mapping the Interior, by Stephen Graham Jones
  27. Autonomous, by Annalee Newitz
  28. Infomocracy, by Malka Older
  29. Reason, the Only Oracle of Man {or} a Compendius System of Natural Religion, by Ethan Allen
  30. Null States, by Malka Older
  31. State Tectonics, by Malka Older
  32. A Memory Called Empire, by Arkady Martine
  33. A History of the Town of Poultney, Vermont, from Its Settlement to the Year 1875, by Joseph Joslin
  34. A Desolation Called Peace, by Arkady Martine
  35. Germ Warfare: A Very Graphic History, by Max Brooks
  36. The Adventure Zone: Here There Be Gerblins, by Clint McElroy, Griffin McElroy, Justin McElroy, Travis McElroy, and Carey Pietsch
  37. Fake Blood, by Whitney Gardner
  38. Sailor Twain {or} The Mermaid in the Hudson, by Mark Siegel
  39. Templar, by Jordan Mechner
  40. Punk Rock Jesus, by Sean Murphy
  41. Factory Summers, by Guy Delisle
  42. Two Dead, by Van Jensen and Nate Powell
  43. The Girl from the Sea, by Molly Knox Ostertag
  44. A.D.: After Death, by Scott Snyder and Jeff Lemire
  45. The Secret to Superhuman Strength, by Alison Bechdel
  46. Walking Wounded: Uncut Stories from Iraq, by Olivier Morel
  47. That Can Be Arranged: A Muslim Love Story, by Huda Fahmy
  48. River of Ink, by Étienne Appert
  49. Unrig: How to Fix Our Broken Democracy, by Dan G. Newman
  50. Mason & Dixon, by Thomas Pynchon
  51. The Jesuits: A History from Ignatius to the Present, by John W. O’Malley
  52. The Awakened Kingdom, by N.K. Jemisin
  53. Say Nothing: A True Story of Murder and Memory in Northern Ireland, by Patrick Radden Keefe
  54. The Song of Achilles, by Madeline Miller
  55. Blind Lake, by Robert Charles Wilson
  56. The Five People You Meet in Heaven, by Mitch Albom
  57. The Mystwick School of Musicraft, by Jessica Khoury
  58. The Dawn of Everything: A New History of Humanity, by David Graeber and David Wengrow
Categories
asides

How Donald Trump Could Subvert the 2024 Election

From How Donald Trump Could Subvert the 2024 Election:

Who or what will safeguard our constitutional order is not apparent today. It is not even apparent who will try. Democrats, big and small D, are not behaving as if they believe the threat is real. Some of them, including President Joe Biden, have taken passing rhetorical notice, but their attention wanders. They are making a grievous mistake.

Categories
asides

We suffer from Republican radicalization

From It’s not ‘polarization.’ We suffer from Republican radicalization:

While it’s true that the country is more deeply divided along partisan lines than it has been in the past, it is wrong to suggest a symmetrical devolution into irrational hatred. The polarization argument too often treats both sides as equally worthy of blame, characterizing the problem as a sort of free-floating affliction (e.g., “lack of trust”). This blurs the distinction between a Democratic Party that is marginally more progressive in policy positions than it was a decade ago, and a Republican Party that routinely lies, courts violence, and seeks to define America as a White Christian nation.

Categories
politics

A Brief Statement Regarding Kyle Rittenhouse

On Friday, November 19, 2021, just after 1:00 pm EST, a citizen jury serving at the Kenosha County Courthouse in Kenosha, Wisconsin, acquitted a young white man named Kyle Rittenhouse of first-degree intentional homicide, first-degree reckless homicide, attempted first-degree intentional homicide, and two counts of first-degree recklessly endangering safety.

The verdict, as with virtually every public decision nowadays, divided the populace of the United States. A large percentage of citizens celebrated the Rittenhouse verdict for strengthening an individual’s right to defend themselves. Another bemoaned the verdict as yet another data point in the criminal court system’s historical defense of white power.

While members of the ruling classes debated the verdict from their laptops and television studios in the country’s major metropolitan areas, a doctor in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, named Kyle Pfefferle, contacted an LSU student he met at the university’s library, a man named Kyle Sellers. Dr. Pfefferle knew Sellers was a double major in computer science and computer engineering set to graduate in December. Dr. Pfefferle challenged Sellers to build a data-mining tool to scrub the Internet for any bit of contact information belonging to each of the Kyles in the United States.

By Saturday evening, Sellers accomplished the task, and at 6:39 pm CST, Pfefferle and Sellers possessed a Google Sheet with the phone numbers and email addresses of over 160,00 individuals in the United States whose names began with Kyle. Based on Social Security data from the past 100 years, experts estimate that over 460,000 Kyles currently reside in the country.

I received my first text from Dr. Pfefferle on Sunday, November 21, 2021, at 8:03 pm EST. It read:

My name’s Doctor Kyle Pfefferle, and I invite you to join a Zoom call tonight to discuss with 163,631 other Kyle’s [sic] what our response will be to the Rittenhouse verdict.

Astounded, I confirmed my interest and attendance.

At 11:10 pm EST, I received an invitation to join the Zoom call, but due to the technical limitations of the service, when I logged on, I found only 99 other Kyles in attendance. Dr. Pfefferle was not one of them. Instead, a middle-aged man named Kyle Pretsch greeted me. Pretsch was a Vice President of IT Development for a company in Phoenix, Arizona, and he introduced himself as the group’s facilitator.

Pretsch announced that out of all the Kyles invited to the emergency conference, 87,917 signaled their willingness to attend. Dr. Pfefferle asked the first respondents to facilitate meetings of 100 Kyles each. Our task was to determine how we felt as a group about the Rittenhouse verdict and to elect a representative who would attend a second gathering to speak on our behalf later in the night.

The meeting lasted 75 minutes. The conversation covered everything from the validity of The New York Times’ 1619 Project to the wisdom of constructing a physical wall along the nation’s southern border. Our facilitator successfully navigated the noisy voices of the rest of us, and as we approached the end of the meeting, he called a vote on whether we, as a group, approved of the Rittenhouse verdict.

With a majority opinion decided, we spent the last five minutes constructing an acceptable statement of our feelings. At the end of the meeting, the group nominated three potential representatives to attend the second meeting. I was humbled when a plurality of these strangers elected me to speak for them. I don’t know why they did so, but I vowed to take the responsibility seriously.

On Monday, November 22, 2021, at 1:30 am EST, I attended another Zoom call with 999 other individuals named Kyle. Each of us represented roughly one hundred other Kyle. I learned that not every Kyle who had signaled their willingness to attend the first meeting had done so, but most had. A few individuals in this second meeting represented groups with odd numbers, but most of us represented 100, and none of us knew who represented the smaller groups.

Dr. Pfefferle facilitated the conversation, but he did not get a vote in the meeting and did not express his opinion. Instead, in his role as facilitator, he wielded the mute button. From my perspective, Dr. Pfefferle restricted his use of the mute button to enforce unspoken rules of time and decorum, but I suspect some of those he muted may have felt slighted.

When Dr. Pfefferle turned the microphone over to me, I spoke on behalf of my constituents to express their opinions and concerns. Out of a sense of fairness to the minority opinion-holders in our group, I also expressed their significant positions. I believe I represented our group fairly.

At the end of the call, Dr. Pfefferle called for nominees to speak on behalf of America’s Kyles. Over 139 names were called in the first round. The voting lasted for 29 rounds, but in the end, the group reached a majority conclusion.

At 6:11 am EST on Monday, November 22, 2021, I was rewarded (or perhaps cursed) to be elected to submit that conclusion for public review.

And so, on behalf of the majority of Kyles of the United States of America whose contact information could be scrubbed from the Internet, I now offer this brief statement:

Fuck Kyle Rittenhouse.

Categories
asides

Fix Facebook by Making It More Like Google+

From Fix Facebook by Making It More Like Google+:

A lot is wrong with the internet, but much of it boils down to this one problem: We are all constantly talking to one another. Take that in every sense. Before online tools, we talked less frequently, and with fewer people. The average person had a handful of conversations a day, and the biggest group she spoke in front of was maybe a wedding reception or a company meeting, a few hundred people at most.

Categories
asides

One Woman’s Mission to Rewrite Nazi History on Wikipedia

From One Woman’s Mission to Rewrite Nazi History on Wikipedia:

[H]istory is an edit war. Truth, factual and moral, hangs in the balance.

Categories
asides

The Death of White America Has Been Greatly Exaggerated

From The Death of White America Has Been Greatly Exaggerated:

During a rant about what he perceived as left-wing giddiness over the “extinction of white people,” [FOX News commentator, Tucker Carlson] asked, “Where did all these people go?” The millions of missing white Americans did not, in fact, go anywhere. And they are not being replaced by minorities. Growing numbers of white Americans have multiracial children and grandchildren. Others were recategorized in 2020 as multiracial themselves, instead of single-race white.

In other words, White America is only going extinct if you maintain the illusory violence of the “one drop rule.