Categories
asides

Um…isn’t it called an Apple Watch?

From The Verge‘s review of the new AI Pin from Humane:

Should you buy this thing? That one’s easy. Nope. Nuh-uh. No way. The AI Pin is an interesting idea that is so thoroughly unfinished and so totally broken in so many unacceptable ways that I can’t think of anyone to whom I’d recommend spending the $699 for the device and the $24 monthly subscription.

After ripping the Pin apart, the reviewer goes on to say:

Still, even after all this frustration, after spending hours standing in front of restaurants tapping my chest and whispering questions that go unanswered, I find I want what Humane is selling even more than I expected. A one-tap way to say, “Text Anna and tell her I’ll be home in a half-hour,” or “Remember to call Mike tomorrow afternoon,” or “Take a picture of this and add it to my shopping list” would be amazing. I hadn’t realized how much of my phone usage consists of these one-step things, all of which would be easier and faster without the friction and distraction of my phone.

Reading that made me wonder if The Verge hadn’t heard of the Apple Watch. Those one-tap tasks are what I use the Apple Watch for, though I don’t even use one tap; I just say, “Hey Siri…”

Raise wrist. “Hey Siri, ask my wife if she needs anything at the grocery store.”

Raise wrist. “Hey Siri, remind me to put the library books in my bag when I get home from work.”

Raise wrist.”Hey Siri, what song is this?”

Raise wrist. “Hey Siri, call my dad.”

Sure, Humane promises that its Pin will be able to do all kinds of cool things in the future. Unfortunately, for now, as The Verge found, “The AI Pin doesn’t work. I don’t know how else to say it.”

The Apple Watch can already do most of the Pin does, and Apple isn’t standing still.

Categories
asides

AI & Copyright

Some people wonder whether copyright law, fundamentally unchanged since the late 1700s, can handle generative AI. Its basic unit is the “copy,” a concept that’s felt like a poor fit for modernity since the launch of music and video streaming in the 1990s. Might generative AI finally bend copyright past the breaking point?

– “Generative AI Is Challenging a 234-Year-Old Law,” The Atlantic
Categories
asides

Buddha A.I.

Forall describes the project of creating an enlightened AI as perhaps “the most important act of all time.” Humans need to “build an AI that walks a spiritual path,” one that will persuade the other AI systems not to harm us.

The Monk Who Thinks the World is Ending, The Atlantic
Categories
asides

A Worm’s Mind In A Lego Body

From A Worm’s Mind In A Lego Body:

Take the connectome of a worm and transplant it as software in a Lego Mindstorms EV3 robot – what happens next?

Categories
asides

Apple is an AI Company Now

From The Atlantic’s Apple Is An AI Company Now:

Its conference unveiling [its iOS] updates included zero mentions of AI, now a buzzword for tech companies of all stripes. Instead, Apple used more technical language such as machine learning or transformer language model.

But Apple is pushing forward with AI in small ways, an incrementalist approach that nonetheless still might be the future of where this technology is headed.

[Don’t] expect any of the machine-learning features Apple announced this year to significantly alter the iPhone-user experience. They’ll just make it nominally better.

All of this is deeply Apple…focusing on what a feature does rather than how it does it. The fact that it’s using AI behind the scenes is no more relevant to users than, say, which programming language they used to create it.

Categories
asides

What Is ChatGPT Doing … and Why Does It Work?

From Stephen Wolfram:

We can say: “Look, this particular [neural] net [works]”—and immediately that gives us some sense of “how hard a problem” it is (and, for example, how many neurons or layers might be needed). But at least as of now we don’t have a way to “give a narrative description” of what the network is doing.

Categories
asides

AI Needs To Be Regulated Now

From AI Needs To Be Regulated Now:

What we need is a dedicated [Federal] agency to regulate A.I. … There is precedent for establishing a necessary agency to protect people from harm. How molecules interact with millions of unique human beings is a complicated subject and not well understood. Yet we created an agency — the Food and Drug Administration — to regulate pharmaceutical drugs.

This critical and necessary endeavor needs to proceed in steps. That’s why I will be introducing legislation to create a nonpartisan A.I. Commission to provide recommendations on how to structure a federal agency to regulate A.I., what types of A.I. should be regulated and what standards should apply.