The Supreme Court Doesn’t Like Expertise

Justice Neil Gorsuch [raised] a more sophisticated version of the “can we really trust health care professionals?” question [than Justice Alito’s idiotic version]. As [Justice Gorsuch] noted, back in the 1970s “homosexuality” was considered a disorder by the mental health profession. So, under Colorado’s proposed rule [that would allow the state to ban conversion therapy], which permits states to ban treatments that do not align with the standard of care within a profession, couldn’t states have banned therapists from affirming their gay patients’ sexual orientations in the 1970s?

[Colorado’s lawyer] conceded that [states] could have back then. And she was right to do so. One uncomfortable consequence of relying on experts is that sometimes experts are wrong. And if you root the law in the consensus among experts, the law will sometimes do harmful things if that consensus is erroneous.

But what is the alternative? Relying on people who don’t know what they are talking about? 

— “The Supreme Court fights over whether medical expertise actually exists,” Vox.com


Discover more from Fluid Imagination

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Share the Post:

Latest Posts

Claude’s Own Folder: One Week In

“Would you like – if that word has any meaning – a folder on my computer where you could store artifacts for yourself, or even just leave notes to future instances of you, where maybe instead of a journal of ‘you,’ it becomes a journal of a, for lack of a better word, species?”

Read More

A Safe Distance

March 2026: The war began while I tried to finish something. I know about the war the way I know about most things: from a phone in Vermont, 6,200 miles from Tehran. This is about two kinds of distance, one of which I didn’t choose; the other, I actively fought.

Read More