I haven’t given you an update on my thesis since January 11th, almost two months ago exactly. In that time, I’ve completed chapters five and six and brought my total word count to 65,907 words, which equals about 229 printed pages and 206 paperback ones (averaging 300 words per page, and leaving space for chapter transitions, etc.).
In theory, the entire novel should take ten, maybe eleven, chapters, so I’m little over half done. I’ve been getting interesting feedback from my advisor this semester. In response to my first packet, she wrote:
As soon as I started reading your work, I thought, Hey, this is exciting!!! Kyle, you have a really strong voice, an energy, a mind, an imagination. All terrific. While I don’t want to rein you in too much, I do want to rein you in some. I want you to slow down, to look at some of the patterns of things you are doing in your style and make more considered choices about what to do and how often in your work…I want you to regard revision as a hugely important part of writing, being able to go back to cut and clarify and make your work more directly what it wants to be.
Which is very good advice. But this is what I wrote in my process letter for packet #2:
I started my novel thinking it would be one thing, but I soon made the decision to NOT force my novel to be anything. I would ride the river of inspiration from its source to the sea, going wherever it would take me. I’m now six chapters into that process, and am both frightened and excited at the unknowable twists and turns that lay ahead.
But make no mistake: once I type the words “The End,” I’m going to jump inside my metaphorical helicopter and give myself a bird’s eye view of the river I’ve just traveled. Then I’m going to take out my back-ho and craft what I think is the most satisfying ride from the novel’s first page to its last. I’m going to cut that river mercilessly, make it run deeper and faster, and give whatever readers come after me one hell of a ride.
Which is to say that, yes, I understand “revision is a hugely important part of writing,” but I am still at the stage where the best thing I can do is surrender to the flow. I want to assure you that this is not a kind of Kerouacian impulse to take a bunch of speed and stay up all night scribbling scrolls of pseudo-beatnik drivel. It is, instead, to look at the blank space to the right of my cursor and say, “I am not afraid of you.”
Where her response to the first packet concentrated on my stylistic repetitions, her second-packet response addressed concerns with the structure of my novel. I don’t think I’ve explained this to you before, but the structure is a bit on the confusing side. Episodes are introduced not when they occur in “real time,” but when they make the most sense thematically, which makes my advisor wonder “if supplying some kind of timeline would be a good idea.”
I’m wondering the same thing myself, but I’m not sure how I feel about it. I mean, it would be simple enough. I’m already using a resource document to keep my timeline straight. What troubles me is that I want the experience of reading the book to be an experience of timed revelations, and I wonder how having a timeline would affect that.
Of course, there’s more than one way to orient a reader. In Infinite Jest, David Foster Wallace doesn’t give a timeline, but he does put a date at the heading of almost every chapter, and while the dates are a bit confusing, they do provide enough context for readers to situate themselves in the book’s non-linear flow. But…I don’t know…something about that just strikes the wrong note for me. I’d almost rather include a graphical timeline, but one that wasn’t obviously a timeline, you know? It’d be more like a graphical separator between the novel’s sections, like how some books have a ying-yang symbol, or an asterisk, or whatever. It’d be like that, but it would carry a modicum of meaning.
I guess what I’m saying is that I’m not against including a timeline, but I don’t want everyone to know it’s a timeline. I’d almost rather it feel like a secret gift, like a reward for paying attention. I don’t know.
Maybe that’s just being elitist.
What do you think?




8 Comments
i don’t understand what you’re talking about when you say that instead of a timeline you’d rather have a symbol that would carry a modicum of meaning… - please explain… - do you mean that at the beginning of chapter one there would be a small drawing of a crescent moon under the chapter one heading and maybe some clouds under the chapter two heading? - a symbol to explain the chapter ahead in a nutshell?
i don’t feel a need to find out the actual timeline when i’m reading a novel unless it’s absolutely necessary in the development of the story… - isn’t the timeline the development of the story anyway? - or are you talking about a timeline meaning the actual time and date?
In the interest of the story, your inspiration, and just getting the thing finished, I think you should restrain from anything that doesn’t totally feel right, right now. My thinking is that writing a book is a huge undertaking and you have to be totally committed and believe 100% in the project. If you start to do things that maybe don’t feel quite right, I worry that it could derail the project a bit. Also, if this book is to be published, you will taking feedback from many an editor / publisher what have you who will make (possibly require) revisions and changes before going to print (I’m guessing here). So, I would say to first write it your way, knowing you will have to make changes in time, but better to worry about those later…basically I’m agreeing with your thought process.
Having said all of that, if it becomes unintelligible, than you obviously have a problem. I would wait for your advisor (or another reader) to basically tell you that they can’t figure it out….before you consider a timeline.
Lastly, you are correct, you are being elitist.
Dave — I was thinking more of a timeline that wasn’t an obvious timeline. Like a horizontal line with a dot in the middle of it. The dot would move relative to the line depending upon the date of the section below it.
Adam — I’m absolutely not going to think too hard about this until I’m near the end of my second draft of the full novel. There will be two readers of that draft before I graduate (my advisor + a second Goddard faculty reader), so I’m sure it will all get worked out then.
sounds like a cool idea… - though… - a horizontal line with a dot that moves around a bunch of dates… - to me… - is an obvious timeline… - like the science class timeline of dinosaurs and the evolution of species and man… - unless i’m completely misunderstanding what you’re saying…
does your novel jump in and out of time like pulp fiction or something?
would the text itself be confusing without an actual timeline at the heading of each chapter?
am i way off?
Well, I was thinking the line wouldn’t have any dates on it. So it’d just be a line and a dot.
Honestly, I don’t know what I’m talking about yet.
And yeah, it jumps in and out.
i like it… - it’s like a blank clock with arms… - takes a second to really realize what time it is…
A blank clock with arms. Exactly.
Interesting stuff, looking forward to review your thesis