From an Op-Ed in the NY Times entitled, Two Presidents Are Worse Than One: “One problem with the George W. Bush administration is that it has brought a kind of plural presidency in through the back door. Vice President Dick Cheney has run his own executive department, with its own intelligence and military operations, not open to scrutiny, as he hides behind the putative president….We have seen in this campaign how former President Clinton rushes to the defense of presidential candidate Clinton. Will that pattern of protection be continued into the new presidency, with not only his defending her but also her defending whatever he might do in his energetic way while she’s in office? It seems likely. And at a time when we should be trying to return to the single-executive system the Constitution prescribes, it does not seem to be a good idea to put another co-president in the White House.”
-
The Game Project
You can contribute to the Great Fluid Imagination Video Game Project by:- Finding out what it is
- Helping us hash out the features
- Completing some items on the To Do List
- Seeing the the latest page additions and changes
Categories
Related Posts
Recently Written
- Half the Battle: Part IV (of 8)
written by Kyle - Half the Battle: Part III (of 8)
written by Kyle - Half the Battle: Part II (of 8)
written by Kyle - Half the Battle: Part I (of 8)
written by Kyle - Today’s Entry in My Writer’s Journal
written by Kyle - How The Deal Went Down
written by Kyle - It Begins
written by Kyle - Friday’s Challenge: Say something nice about “the other guy.”
written by Kyle - History Repeats Itself for Catholics
written by Val Dumais - A Message From The Institute for America’s Future
written by Kyle
- Half the Battle: Part IV (of 8)
Recent Comments
- david commented on One Reason Detroit Should Be Allowed To Fail: the twenty five billion dollars was...
- justin commented on One Reason Detroit Should Be Allowed To Fail: Just wanted to say that the took ho...
- Alex commented on The First Inkling of a Legacy: Baller....
- david commented on Today’s Entry in My Writer’s Journal: and one......
- Steven Earl Salmony commented on Even with a socialist senator, we got the best banking: The greedy people in dark, pin stri...
Top Commenters
Tag Cloud
2008-election america annotation Apple art blogs Books bush clinton congress cooking creative-writing culture democrats economy education environmentalism fiction food global-warming goddard green-mountain-college impeachment internet iraq liberalism life Macintosh marijuana mccain media Movies Music obama Politics Religion republicans Science Stumpy vermont war Web web2.0 wordpress writing-
Recently Read
Now Hearing- How I Met Your Mother – Single Stamina
- Sufjan Stevens – Out Of Egypt, Into The Great L
- The Beatles – Come Together
- Johnny Cash – Rose Of My Heart
- Yo-Yo Ma, Mark O'Connor, Edgar Meyer – 1B
- Baka Beyond – The Man Who Played Too Slowly
- Feist – Mushaboom
- The Beatles – While My Guitar Gently Weeps
- Phish – Free
- Blues Traveler – All Hands
-
Meta



3 Comments
Is it just me or is this turning into a clinton bashing site? If you think that the first lady/man would have no opinion on public policy you are mistaken. The question is would the president be strong enough to make sure that the message coming out of the white house was one that the president wants. I have no problem with a president taking advice from smart people and using it to help with any problems that they have.
I wouldn’t say it’s a Clinton-bashing site, though I would say that after last week’s fracas between Obama and Clinton, there was a little bit more animosity toward the Clintons than usual on FI.
I have no problems with a President taking advice from smart people either. But I thought this particular Op-Ed writer had a good point when he compared the possibility of having the two Clintons in the White House with the dual-executive reality of the Bush/Cheney administration.
And I thought it might be an interesting point to others. Hence, it made my link of the day list.
The first lady/man has a lot on their plate no matter who it is. Is having bill and his experience there a bad thing?
So no backlash for Obama took out a piece in the times when he said that Clinton could not be trusted because of her war vote? That seemed to be what started this whole thing.