From the Financial Times’ article, High society: “It is clear that drugs policy would be infinitely better conducted if governments actually had some influence on the business. Legalisation would enable them to tax the drugs, ensure quality control, cut out the most dangerous strains, help genuine addicts, try to prevent the sale to minors, de-glamorise the habit and, above all, deny the gangs and the terrorists their financial lifeblood. But, as so often, politicians find it safer to go in for posturing than useful action.”
Categories
Related Posts
Recently Written
- Hot Texas Pork Poppers
written by Shawn - The Debates: Round Two
written by mr. crickets - I’m Mad As Hell
written by Kyle - What You All Think of the Debates?
written by Kyle - The other other thing
written by Kyle - Stumpy’s Steak Tips and Sauce
written by Shawn - George Washington Was A Domestic Terrorist
written by Kyle - If assets = elitism
written by Kyle - The Crisis - In Four Easy Steps
written by Kyle - A Friendly Reminder
written by mr. crickets
- Hot Texas Pork Poppers
Recent Comments
- Kyle commented on What People Should Know: It's the price we pay for writing/r...
- Dovev commented on What People Should Know: So...um...what's up with the politi...
- david commented on What People Should Know: i'm beginning to get incredibly ang...
- Adam commented on Making The World A Better Place: as a former economics major, I'm fa...
- Adam commented on Making The World A Better Place: you obviously didn't read all of th...
Top Commenters
- Justin (843)
- david (626)
- Adam (236)
- leigh (234)
- Jess (200)
Tag Cloud
2008-election america annotation Apple art blogs Books bush clinton congress cooking creative-writing culture democrats economy education environmentalism fiction food global-warming goddard green-mountain-college impeachment internet iraq liberalism life Macintosh marijuana mccain media Movies Music obama Politics Religion republicans Science Stumpy vermont war Web web2.0 wordpress writingNow Reading
None
Now Hearing-
Meta

