<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Looking for Inspiration.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fluidimagination.com/blog/2007/02/16/looking-for-inspiration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fluidimagination.com/blog/2007/02/16/looking-for-inspiration/</link>
	<description>Melting down disparate elements to form a new reality.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 18:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: justin</title>
		<link>http://fluidimagination.com/blog/2007/02/16/looking-for-inspiration/#comment-12121</link>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 00:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fluidimagination.com/blog/2007/02/16/looking-for-inspiration/#comment-12121</guid>
		<description>I agree Mormonism is pretty fucked but I have no problem with that or any other religion. What you said is the main reason he will not elected and there are people out there who say things like "I will not vote for a woman because  or "I will not vote for Obama because 

And yes I am saying that not voting for a mormon because he is a mormon is as insane as not voting for a woman or person that is not pasty white.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Mormonism is pretty fucked but I have no problem with that or any other religion. What you said is the main reason he will not elected and there are people out there who say things like &#8220;I will not vote for a woman because  or &#8220;I will not vote for Obama because </p>
<p>And yes I am saying that not voting for a mormon because he is a mormon is as insane as not voting for a woman or person that is not pasty white.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://fluidimagination.com/blog/2007/02/16/looking-for-inspiration/#comment-12108</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 18:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fluidimagination.com/blog/2007/02/16/looking-for-inspiration/#comment-12108</guid>
		<description>That's because Mormons believe in some crazy shit. And if you're gullible enough to believe in Mormonism, then I really don't want you running my country. The same could be said of pretty much any religion, of course, but I don't think this theocratic country is going to elect an atheist anytime soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s because Mormons believe in some crazy shit. And if you&#8217;re gullible enough to believe in Mormonism, then I really don&#8217;t want you running my country. The same could be said of pretty much any religion, of course, but I don&#8217;t think this theocratic country is going to elect an atheist anytime soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justin</title>
		<link>http://fluidimagination.com/blog/2007/02/16/looking-for-inspiration/#comment-12106</link>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 18:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fluidimagination.com/blog/2007/02/16/looking-for-inspiration/#comment-12106</guid>
		<description>I am not saying to vote for him or he is or is not a douche, my point is that the only reason some people will not vite for him is because he is a mormon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not saying to vote for him or he is or is not a douche, my point is that the only reason some people will not vite for him is because he is a mormon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Bloom</title>
		<link>http://fluidimagination.com/blog/2007/02/16/looking-for-inspiration/#comment-12100</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Bloom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 16:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fluidimagination.com/blog/2007/02/16/looking-for-inspiration/#comment-12100</guid>
		<description>Why would you vote for Romney? He's a douche.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would you vote for Romney? He&#8217;s a douche.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justin</title>
		<link>http://fluidimagination.com/blog/2007/02/16/looking-for-inspiration/#comment-12046</link>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 20:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fluidimagination.com/blog/2007/02/16/looking-for-inspiration/#comment-12046</guid>
		<description>We will see how advanced this country is. I just do not see this country electingsomeone who is not male or pasty white. Shit people won't vote for Romney because he is mormon. 

I am all set with Gore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We will see how advanced this country is. I just do not see this country electingsomeone who is not male or pasty white. Shit people won&#8217;t vote for Romney because he is mormon. </p>
<p>I am all set with Gore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://fluidimagination.com/blog/2007/02/16/looking-for-inspiration/#comment-12041</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 17:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fluidimagination.com/blog/2007/02/16/looking-for-inspiration/#comment-12041</guid>
		<description>I'm excited about Obama, so he's probably got my vote at the moment, but over the next--what? 21 months?--there's a chance that Edwards could step things up. It seems as if he's been speaking his mind for the last 10 months or so, and if he keeps it up and doesn't get all smarmy, he's got a chance in my eyes (not to win per se, but to win my vote). Of course, if Gore actually does step into the race, all bets are off. Because Gore has impressed the hell out of me for the last four years.

In that case, if Gore, Edwards, and Obama are all in it, and all still impressive in their ways, then I don't know who I'd vote for. 

I'll tell you who I won't vote for, though, and that's Hillary Clinton. She ain't ever getting my vote. Not even in the general. I don't like Guiliani or McCain, and I'm pretty sure I don't like Romney, but I REALLY don't like Clinton. If she makes it to the general, I'll probably find a third-party candidate to vote for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m excited about Obama, so he&#8217;s probably got my vote at the moment, but over the next&#8211;what? 21 months?&#8211;there&#8217;s a chance that Edwards could step things up. It seems as if he&#8217;s been speaking his mind for the last 10 months or so, and if he keeps it up and doesn&#8217;t get all smarmy, he&#8217;s got a chance in my eyes (not to win per se, but to win my vote). Of course, if Gore actually does step into the race, all bets are off. Because Gore has impressed the hell out of me for the last four years.</p>
<p>In that case, if Gore, Edwards, and Obama are all in it, and all still impressive in their ways, then I don&#8217;t know who I&#8217;d vote for. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll tell you who I won&#8217;t vote for, though, and that&#8217;s Hillary Clinton. She ain&#8217;t ever getting my vote. Not even in the general. I don&#8217;t like Guiliani or McCain, and I&#8217;m pretty sure I don&#8217;t like Romney, but I REALLY don&#8217;t like Clinton. If she makes it to the general, I&#8217;ll probably find a third-party candidate to vote for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://fluidimagination.com/blog/2007/02/16/looking-for-inspiration/#comment-12005</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 23:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fluidimagination.com/blog/2007/02/16/looking-for-inspiration/#comment-12005</guid>
		<description>i'll tell you this... - it won't be a republican... - no matter how many times mccain goes on saturday night live... - he's still a pile of goo that blinks seven times every three seconds... - that's what he reminds me of... - a stinking pile of blinking goo... - in a suit...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;ll tell you this&#8230; - it won&#8217;t be a republican&#8230; - no matter how many times mccain goes on saturday night live&#8230; - he&#8217;s still a pile of goo that blinks seven times every three seconds&#8230; - that&#8217;s what he reminds me of&#8230; - a stinking pile of blinking goo&#8230; - in a suit&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justin</title>
		<link>http://fluidimagination.com/blog/2007/02/16/looking-for-inspiration/#comment-11998</link>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 20:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fluidimagination.com/blog/2007/02/16/looking-for-inspiration/#comment-11998</guid>
		<description>To early for me, I need to see at least a billion dollars spent on commercials, the daily shows count downs and snipits of the candidates speeches taken out of contex to make them look dumb, and other good sources of information. 

That would be if I voted.

Kyle, getting the "political news" from the daily show is the same as getting it from the political comics in the newspaper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To early for me, I need to see at least a billion dollars spent on commercials, the daily shows count downs and snipits of the candidates speeches taken out of contex to make them look dumb, and other good sources of information. </p>
<p>That would be if I voted.</p>
<p>Kyle, getting the &#8220;political news&#8221; from the daily show is the same as getting it from the political comics in the newspaper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://fluidimagination.com/blog/2007/02/16/looking-for-inspiration/#comment-11993</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 18:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fluidimagination.com/blog/2007/02/16/looking-for-inspiration/#comment-11993</guid>
		<description>Wow. A ton of comments since I came by here last. So, as I read through, if I have anything to say, I'm just gonna scroll down here to the comment form and insert it. This may come off a little willy-nilly:

* Adam, good link on the Civil Union/Civil Marriage thing. It helped me changed my mind. I'll take a civil marriage, thank you very much.

* Dovev, in Adam's post, he said something about how Obama's stance is posturing for votes, but I don't think that's fair. At most, it's cynical. I know people who feel exactly as Obama does. They believe homosexuals should have all the rights and benefits and responsibilities that come with marriage, but they don't want homosexuals to use the word marriage. None of the people I know are trying to win votes.

*  Josh, in the second-to-last season of West Wing, there's an episode (episode 20: In God We Trust) where it's revealed the Republican candidate for President, played by Alan Alda, doesn't go to church and hasn't believed in God since his wife died of cancer. At the end of the episode, the press asks him if he believes in God, and he says, "I don't see how we can a separation of Church and state in this government if we have to pass a religious test to get into this government. And I want to warn all the press and all the voters out there, if you demand expressions of religious faith from politicians, you are just begging to be lied to. They won't all lie to you, but a lot of them will. And it'll be the easiest lie they ever had to tell to get your votes. So from this day to the end of this campaign, I'll answer any question anyone has on government, but if you have have a question on religion, please, go to Church." Of course, it should be said, that the writers of West Wing -- mostly liberals -- tried to create a Republican candidate they would vote for.

* Dovev, I second that on getting rid of "trivial politics." But it'd be interesting to see what kind of policies this could actually motivate.

* Adam, the founding fathers are traditionally considered the group of men who helped write the U.S. Constitution, and not so much the Puritans who landed on Plymouth Rock. Within the founding fathers, you have pantheists, deists, and all sorts of varieties of Christians.

* Adam again, re: The Daily Show; I don't think it is filled with cynicism. If you watch it, you'll see how earnestly Jon Stewart wants to believe in government again.

* Justin &#38; Josh: Oops, you corrected Adam already.

* Justin, re: the use of the Daily Show: while I think the ultimate goal of the Daily Show is to make us laugh -- Jon Stewart made that clear when &lt;a href="http://www.ifilm.com/ifilmdetail/2652831" rel="nofollow"&gt;he appeared on Crossfire&lt;/a&gt; (an appearance that led to the cancellation of Crossfire)--but I also think that it's as good a show as any to get "the news." With that being said, I think anyone that depends on television news as their primary source of information is woefully uninformed. In the same way that one you should use Wikipedia, one should use the TV news (including the Daily Show); that is, use it a spur to find out more, and not as a final source all its own. With the Daily Show, you can at least know what motivates their selection of what to air and what not to air (the chance for a laugh), whereas with the regular news, who knows what ulterior motive lies behind each segment and news crawl.

* Justin: I second the idea of taking the words of the founding fathers for what their worth -- they were not gods, nor did they want to be.

Now, just to try to bring it all back to Obama for a moment, we know that, at this moment anyway, Obama has Adam's vote. Where do the rest of you stand?

Again, just a straw poll here. We won't hunt you down and kill you if you change your mind tomorrow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. A ton of comments since I came by here last. So, as I read through, if I have anything to say, I&#8217;m just gonna scroll down here to the comment form and insert it. This may come off a little willy-nilly:</p>
<p>* Adam, good link on the Civil Union/Civil Marriage thing. It helped me changed my mind. I&#8217;ll take a civil marriage, thank you very much.</p>
<p>* Dovev, in Adam&#8217;s post, he said something about how Obama&#8217;s stance is posturing for votes, but I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s fair. At most, it&#8217;s cynical. I know people who feel exactly as Obama does. They believe homosexuals should have all the rights and benefits and responsibilities that come with marriage, but they don&#8217;t want homosexuals to use the word marriage. None of the people I know are trying to win votes.</p>
<p>*  Josh, in the second-to-last season of West Wing, there&#8217;s an episode (episode 20: In God We Trust) where it&#8217;s revealed the Republican candidate for President, played by Alan Alda, doesn&#8217;t go to church and hasn&#8217;t believed in God since his wife died of cancer. At the end of the episode, the press asks him if he believes in God, and he says, &#8220;I don&#8217;t see how we can a separation of Church and state in this government if we have to pass a religious test to get into this government. And I want to warn all the press and all the voters out there, if you demand expressions of religious faith from politicians, you are just begging to be lied to. They won&#8217;t all lie to you, but a lot of them will. And it&#8217;ll be the easiest lie they ever had to tell to get your votes. So from this day to the end of this campaign, I&#8217;ll answer any question anyone has on government, but if you have have a question on religion, please, go to Church.&#8221; Of course, it should be said, that the writers of West Wing &#8212; mostly liberals &#8212; tried to create a Republican candidate they would vote for.</p>
<p>* Dovev, I second that on getting rid of &#8220;trivial politics.&#8221; But it&#8217;d be interesting to see what kind of policies this could actually motivate.</p>
<p>* Adam, the founding fathers are traditionally considered the group of men who helped write the U.S. Constitution, and not so much the Puritans who landed on Plymouth Rock. Within the founding fathers, you have pantheists, deists, and all sorts of varieties of Christians.</p>
<p>* Adam again, re: The Daily Show; I don&#8217;t think it is filled with cynicism. If you watch it, you&#8217;ll see how earnestly Jon Stewart wants to believe in government again.</p>
<p>* Justin &amp; Josh: Oops, you corrected Adam already.</p>
<p>* Justin, re: the use of the Daily Show: while I think the ultimate goal of the Daily Show is to make us laugh &#8212; Jon Stewart made that clear when <a href="http://www.ifilm.com/ifilmdetail/2652831" rel="nofollow">he appeared on Crossfire</a> (an appearance that led to the cancellation of Crossfire)&#8211;but I also think that it&#8217;s as good a show as any to get &#8220;the news.&#8221; With that being said, I think anyone that depends on television news as their primary source of information is woefully uninformed. In the same way that one you should use Wikipedia, one should use the TV news (including the Daily Show); that is, use it a spur to find out more, and not as a final source all its own. With the Daily Show, you can at least know what motivates their selection of what to air and what not to air (the chance for a laugh), whereas with the regular news, who knows what ulterior motive lies behind each segment and news crawl.</p>
<p>* Justin: I second the idea of taking the words of the founding fathers for what their worth &#8212; they were not gods, nor did they want to be.</p>
<p>Now, just to try to bring it all back to Obama for a moment, we know that, at this moment anyway, Obama has Adam&#8217;s vote. Where do the rest of you stand?</p>
<p>Again, just a straw poll here. We won&#8217;t hunt you down and kill you if you change your mind tomorrow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justin</title>
		<link>http://fluidimagination.com/blog/2007/02/16/looking-for-inspiration/#comment-11885</link>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 22:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fluidimagination.com/blog/2007/02/16/looking-for-inspiration/#comment-11885</guid>
		<description>They said that and had slaves, that is why I don't like when people quote what they said like it has any bearing on what is going on today. You can not separate the two completely because for a lot of people their morals come from their religion. Now a simplistic way to look at government (legislators) and their job to make laws (statutes) is they are supposed to take the groups morals and turn that into laws. But some peopleâ€™s morals come from their personal ethics and some from their religious beliefs. Marriage is not mentioned in the constitution so that leaves that issue up to each state. 

The problem we run into with marriage and the constitution is in the big C it says that each state has to abide by other states laws. For instance if it is legal for a person to get married at 15 in Alabama and the legal age is 18 in Texas, if the couple gets married in Alabama then moves to Texas, Texas has to recognize their marriage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They said that and had slaves, that is why I don&#8217;t like when people quote what they said like it has any bearing on what is going on today. You can not separate the two completely because for a lot of people their morals come from their religion. Now a simplistic way to look at government (legislators) and their job to make laws (statutes) is they are supposed to take the groups morals and turn that into laws. But some peopleâ€™s morals come from their personal ethics and some from their religious beliefs. Marriage is not mentioned in the constitution so that leaves that issue up to each state. </p>
<p>The problem we run into with marriage and the constitution is in the big C it says that each state has to abide by other states laws. For instance if it is legal for a person to get married at 15 in Alabama and the legal age is 18 in Texas, if the couple gets married in Alabama then moves to Texas, Texas has to recognize their marriage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
