Things I Learned During the Week of Jan. 29 - Feb. 3

Every week (for at least two weeks in a row now), I write up a list of all the things I’ve learned over the past week. This is a special little treat that I like to file under Gobbledygook. But enough of the explanatory note. On with the show.

Here’s what I learned this week…

  1. …from moving pictures:
    • That “the sins of the father” works for mothers too. It seems that a is cursed by her mother as much as a boy is cursed by his father. You always hear the “my father was a drunk” or “my father never approved of me” or “my dad didn’t stick around long enough to teach me how to be a man” thing when you listen to hoods try to explain why they’re in jail. It’s the same thing, but for mothers, when you listen to a girl hood. The difference, however, seems to be that where boys usually want to fight their fathers, girls want to hug their mothers.
  2. …from books:
    • That the answer to “What is human nature?” assumes that humans can be accurately conceived in the abstract. While there are all sorts of problems with this assumption — such as the Levinas’ idea that an individual is absolutely separate from any category — it does provoke an interesting response: If there is a human nature, it must be distinguished from other natures, for example, the nature of lions. Interestingly, the most common notion of human nature is that whatever distinguishes us from other natures is what makes us above all of nature.

      Montesquieu writes in his :

      When a man takes stock of himself, how satisfying it is for him to conclude that he has justice in his heart! - it may be an austere pleasure, but it is bound to cause him delight, as he realizes that his state is far above those without justice as he is above tigers and bears. Truly…if I were sure that I could put into practice, constantly and unfailingly, that equity which I can visualize, I should consider myself supreme among men. [Letter 83]

      I take Montesquieu to mean that it is a sense of justice that demarcates the human. This is not to say that all homo sapiens have a sense of justice, i.e., that all those creatures who share the biology of humans are moral, but it is to say that only those with a moral sense belong to that privileged class we call human. That would explain the actions of the animals that we read about in the newspaper.

    • That “with truths of a certain kind, it is not enough to make them appear convincing; one must also make them felt. Of such a kind are moral truths.” (Letter 11)
    • That virtue is not a restriction of freedom, but rather, it is the highest exemplification of freedom. Both Montesquieu and Levinas have posited this idea, though both in different ways. Montesquieu shows it through (highly recommend following that link). Levinas writes about it in :

      [In European thought,] the spontaneity of freedom is not called into question; its limitation alone is held to be tragic and to constitute a scandal…[and]…from [freedom's] failure alone would come the necessity of curbing violence and introducing order into human relations. Political theory derives justice from the undiscussed value of spontaneity….[but] morality begins when freedom, instead of being justified by itself, feels itself to be arbitrary and violent…The essence of reason consists not in securing for man a foundation and powers, but in calling him in question and in inviting him to justice. (pp. 83, 84, & 88)

      The reasoning here privileges justice over freedom, which makes a tremendous amount of sense to me. And in part, it is what scares me about the President’s constant refrain. It’s not freedom the world needs, but justice (and not in the form of retribution).

  3. …from the web:
    • That there’s a reason its called - because it’s what enlightenment must look like.
    • That are a neat solution to the problem of screen refreshment. Although, I think “smart pixels” would have been a better name. I mean, I realize that name is already taken, but actual smart pixels sound more like “robot eyes” than pixels. But hey, I’m just an advertising copywriter. What do I know?
    • That someone made a movie entitled, . I haven’t been this excited about a movie since I heard they were doing Lord of the Rings. For those who don’t know, is considered to be the first postmodern novel. It was written between the years of 1759-1767. Sure, at that point, there still hadn’t been a modernism, let alone a postmodernism, but there’s a reason the book is a masterpiece. It was 200 years ahead of its time.
    • That Apple has filed a patent for something called an accelerometer, which has an interesting video-game application. Most people seem to think it’ll go in the iPod. If it does, it effectively would turn your iPod into a kinesthetic controller, ala the . Imagine you were playing a racing game on your iPod. Instead of using the scroll wheel to steer or something, you’d simply turn the whole iPod. The image on the screen would stay right-side up, but, obviously, the “car” would turn. Or, you could slide the iPod to the side to turn just a little bit. Check out these two images from the patent application (one and two) for what I mean.
    • That Tennyson’s line, ‘Nature, red in tooth and claw” is not so much a simple aphorism, as a small part of a larger and more complex poem.
    • That there aren’t nearly enough visualizers for iTunes.
    • That Bob Dylan wrote, “,” and not Emmylou Harris. Though Emmylou’s version is about 274 times better than Bob’s.
    • That may be one of the most thought-provoking sites on the Internet.
    • That the fact that I don’t have cable doesn’t prevent me from watching C-Span.
    • That there’s at least one Web browser that has put some thought into page transitions (watch this 2.5 MB QT movie of ). Unfortunately, the programmers have decided to use the metaphor of “turning the page” for the transition. While this makes sense due to the fact that these things are called Web pages, I think it fails to link up to that single factor that makes the Web more progressive than books, namely, it ignores the concept of hyperspace. For my take on how Web page transitions can utilize this spatial concept, read my (rambling) post from MuchTooMuch, Think Desire.
    • That single women can cuddle themselves to sleep too, thanks to the Boyfriend Arm Pillow.
    • That the folks at 37Signals are coming out with a new chat application, called . Apparently, they’re conceiving chat as a collaboration tool. And because there’s no software to install, this may be my chance to get Adam onto some sort of instant messenger.
    • That no one should ever take a photo of their band, ever, ever again - or else you might end up in .
    • That the U.S. Senate redesigned their home page.
    • That Tim Berners-Lee, the guy who stole the idea of the World Wide Web from Al Gore, thinks you should (aka “web address”).
    • On a related note, that I don’t understand why confuses me. I get the basic idea, but the process of creating a FOAF file and putting it on your site just seems more difficult than it needs to be.
    • That the new toolbar for IE7 shows how much Microsoft just doesn’t get it.
    • That Frank Defelice, aka Defa (the infamous gym teacher from my years in middle school) got fired from leading the Swampscott high-school baseball team. I never really liked the guy, but he was in the Massachusetts Baseball Coaches Association Hall of Fame. Rumor has it that he was only fired because the new school superintendent, who, it seems, no one likes, had it in for him. And that’s just not cool.
    • That someone really doesn’t appreciate .
    • That there are .
    • That there’s a place I can go when

  4. …from life:
    • That some people will never learn.
    • That Dawn and I can make a damn fine chili, even if it is vegetarian.
    • That feminist philosophy professors look really awkward when they’re trying to open the Playboy centerfold at my kitchen table.
    • That sometimes people feel better when they’re angry.
    • That the snow gods are apparently on strike this year.
    • That I learn 10x more from writing than I do from reading.
    • That is cooler than .
    • That trying to stay on top of your studying game when no is going to ask you about it for another three months can be rather difficult.
    • That I don’t like shopping in hippie food co-ops, mostly because they don’t carry Doritos.
    • On a related, that your whole day can be thrown off by starting at the other end of the grocery store (for example, instead of starting in the produce section, you start in the frozen food section).
    • That I can be really annoying when my girlfriend has PMS.

And that’s it for this week. Thanks for getting your mind all stuck in my Gobbledygook.

11 Comments

  1. justin
    Posted February 6, 2006 at 07:30 pm | Permalink

    That guy arm pillow is creepy.

    Also how can you learn more by writing then reading. If you are writing than you are just recording shit you already know, if you are reading you are(depending on what you are reading) getting new information.

  2. Posted February 7, 2006 at 01:38 am | Permalink

    The whole “writing is recording” comment deserves a debate that I’m not sure you want to get into with me. A case could be made that the debate is the subject of my college major.

  3. Posted February 7, 2006 at 11:51 am | Permalink

    Justin, Kyle has a major point here.

    Writing is not simply a record of thoughts, it is in many ways the only way to transform these wisps of thoughts into solid forms.

    -Josh

  4. justin
    Posted February 7, 2006 at 05:10 pm | Permalink

    While I agree that by writing shit down forms the basis for ideas, these fragments were already floating around your brain waiting to be put together. Since they were floating around your brain then you already knew them, thus you are not learning anything new. The new part is those fragments put together. This can be called an assumption, a hypothesis, or even an epiphany but it does not make it right. If what you have learned by putting those things together is wrong then you did not learn anything.
    Back to the real point
    You can argue with me all you want but there is no way you can learn more new things by writing then reading.

    So can you learn by writing-yes. Can you learn more by reading-not even a question.

  5. leigh
    Posted February 9, 2006 at 11:14 pm | Permalink

    For the Green Mountaineers out there let me tell you about Mr. Defelice. He was our Middle School Phys Ed teacher. After gym he used to stand on a pedestal above the shower stalls where the “controls and valves” were. From here he could look down into the line of showers that the seventh and eighth grade boys were supposed to slowly walk through (like a car wash). We would all line up in our towels, single file in front of the entrance. The opening was across and to the left of his perch. He would then command us, with his arms folded (whistle hanging from neck), to take off our towels and walk through the showers. The showers formed sort of a square and you would exit where you came in. But the longest line was the one directly below the stage from where he watched. And he did watch. That’s fucked.

    So ask me if I give a shit if some washed up old pervert was fired.

  6. leigh
    Posted February 9, 2006 at 11:17 pm | Permalink

    I would also like to add that I totally enjoy reading Gobbledygook. And I found the rest of the stuff to be most pleasant.

  7. justin
    Posted February 9, 2006 at 11:34 pm | Permalink

    Thanks buddy it took years of repression to hide those memories in the deep casms of my mind. If there is a sudden killing of male gym teachers in the north shore area you can thank leigh.

    damn you goobledygook, damn you all to hell.

  8. justin
    Posted February 10, 2006 at 04:59 pm | Permalink

    Also what I learned this week is that “the boondocks” which is a comic is now a cartoon on adult swim. Great show, great writing and I am white so that says something.

  9. justin
    Posted February 11, 2006 at 06:55 pm | Permalink

    Hey kyle I think this might merit a bigger space. These people might have found a cure for AIDS.
    http://www.sltrib.com/business/ci_3482712

  10. Posted February 12, 2006 at 03:36 am | Permalink

    I’ve watched 3 episodes of the Boondocks. The first was the Martin Luther King special, which was awesome. The other two, I forgot as soon as they finished. I haven’t seen it since.

    And I am still refraining from entering into the “writing is recording” debate.

  11. justin
    Posted February 12, 2006 at 01:50 pm | Permalink

    I understand what you are saying about learning through writing, and I agree. My issue was the learning more writing. The only way you would learn from more writing is if you already know everything. If you take one subject and learn everything there is to know about it, then you would learn more from writing because those would be new ideas. (2+2=4; 4 being the new idea, 2 being what know about the subject) It is easier to learn about the 2 because someone already did the 1+1=2 for you. Making new thoughts are harder then reading other peoples.

    That is all I am saying.

2 Trackbacks

  1. By Just a Memo on February 8, 2006 at 02:05 am

    Was I Right or Was I Right?!…

    Oh man, I forgot I wrote this this past December 14 after hearing great news on 37signals’ new product, Campfire. Sweetness! =p Speaking of predictions and the new year, I wonder how new products such as Microsoft’s Expression, Kaboodle……

  2. By The Fluid Imagination Blog » AIDS cure? on February 12, 2006 at 03:25 am

    [...] [Props to Justin on this one.] [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Copyright © 2007 Fluid Imagination. All rights reserved.